Impact of drain spacing on subsurface drainage and greenhouse gas fluxes in a grassland on a Mollic gleysol in western Norway

← Takaisin
Tekijä Hansen, Sissel ; Rivedal, Synnøve; Øpstad, Samson ; Deelstra, Johannes ; Børresen, Trond ; Torp, Torfinn ; Dörsch, Peter
Sarja Soil & Tillage Research
DOI/ISBN-numero https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2026.107067
Päivämäärä 2026
Avainsanat | N2O, CH4, Drain intensity, Drainable porosity, Forage production, Ground water table, nitrogen
Rahoitus Norwegian Fund for Research Fees on Agricultural products (FFL), Norwegian Research Fund
Sivut 13 s.
Volyymi Volume 259
Kieli englanti
Saatavuus Impact of drain spacing on subsurface drainage and greenhouse gas fluxes in a grassland on a Mollic gleysol in western Norway

To study the effect of drainage intensity on GHG emissions and N drainage losses in cool-humid Norway, we established drainage systems with 6 and 12 m drain spacing in a previously undrained sandy loam (Mollic gleysol) collecting data in the years 2014–2016. After sowing a mixed grass ley, subsurface drainage was larger (1271 versus 699 mm) and mean ground water table (GWT) lower (102 versus 79 cm) with 6 than with 12 m drain spacing. Water filled pore space (WFPS) remained high throughout most of the year (>80 %). It was highest in 12 m drain spacing, but shortly after fertilizations no differences between the two drainage systems were found. N2O emissions after fertilization were larger in the 12 m system than in the 6 m system. Cumulative N2O emissions in the 6 and 12 m system were 4.0 versus 2.5 kg N ha 2 yr 1. N leaching for the entire observation period (29 months) was larger in the 6 m (42 kg ha 1) than the 12 m (19 kg ha 1) system. Grass yields, plant N-recovery and fertilizer N use efficiency was larger with 6 than 12 m. The mean N2O emission factor was significantly higher with 6 than with 12 m drain spacing (1.4 versus 0.8 % N2O-N of N applied). The 6 m system acted as a net sink for CH4, whereas the 12 m system was a net CH4 source and had a higher climate forcing than the 12 m system (1390 versus 1110 g CO2 eq. m2 yr 1), but scaled for grass dry matter yield the climate forcing was similar. We conclude that larger N2O emissions with 6 m drain spacing were likely due to a combination of less complete denitrification and a naturally higher SOM content at this site, releasing extra mineral N. Our study can therefore not confirm that increased drainage intensity intrinsically reduces N2O emissions from crop production in cool-humid climates.